Welcome
unlogged user!

http://www.dentalblogger.com/site/index.php?module=formicula&func=main

Connect • Contribute • Care

Register today to submit and comment. Help us build and enhance content.

Consumers let us know what really matters.
Dentists let consumers know what to expect, demand, and treat.

Dental Pjeudoscience: Throwing People For A Loop

Posted by RAC on Monday, August 04, 2008 - 03:10 AM

high-five boys image

Imagine being sick. No, imagine someone you would die for being sick. Plus the disease they have is incurable. You would do anything for them and let them do anything that might help them, including spending their last dime – which might also be your last dime.

From what I can tell, you can accomplish this goal with “Dental Revision” – not the curing goal – but the giving their bank account a-completely-cleaned-out-bill-of-health goal. While I am not a dentist or even a scientist, I am someone who has people I would die for to save their life. At some point I might have to make decisions while being emotionally challenged. I will need to make a decision using all the evidence I have at my disposal. While a dentist, medical doctor or scientist might help guide me and you, we will be making the final decision.

I will want to believe in a cure. But that belief in a medical cure should have some bearing on what is proved to a large extent. Otherwise the potential for being drawn to the snake oil psychic who dabbles in hoodwinkism becomes much easier.

The basic premise I see in Dental Revision as a solution to currently “incurable diseases” like ALS and cancer is that since we cannot cure the disease with “other methods” we might as well try something else because people will pay for it.

Dental revision is based on some notion of toxic elements in our bodies often related to mercury found in dentistry materials. Dental mercury is bandied about as dangerous by some without a lot of empirical evidence that there is a danger in the amounts found in fillings or what might leech out. Often the supporters of the dental mercury poisoning concept latch onto a belief that even it is not seen in “most large studies” specific people have this “m-spot” (or weakest link) in the mouth where the mercury vapors seep into.

Much of their belief in “bad dental mercury” is based on anecdotal “proof” such as “Bob who is a great friend of mine says his son was helped a lot by this great herbal remedy that also has helped his rid his neighborhood of unicorns”. The other way they muddy the water is with emotional pjeudoscience is by refuting the results of a study with comments from a person who has the disease or is the parent of someone with the disease. While I would have wanted to believe my mom in a situation like this, she was not a scientist. Her emotional investment should be suspect. If she did not believe in blood transfusions for example, I would think most doctors would have been suspicious of her as well.

Another common example of flight from proven reality is pjeudoscience “framing”. Framing the issue with very little proof or using an authority figure with a few initials after their name to offer some credibility to throw you off base. Nearly an “Oh Yah” type defense. The supporters of always changing concept of “natural dental health or overall wellness care” start with the real scientific study that confirms the opposite of what they believe (which makes it seem like they are being fair) and then use one or maybe a few doctors to refute the study with their own anecdote, an old study or one puny study from some supporter of holistic dental health research firm. Then if that does not work – the government is trying to cover it up.

While this might be a dental mercury conspiracy by the establishment, I posit that there is at least as much evidence that there is a conspiracy coordinated by “supposed” health care professionals of bogus medical cures. These pseudo-scientists, complementary and alternate medicine dentists and doctors could have some answers and put forth ideas with merit but they should not be given total authority over your reality.

Here are some things to do when considering your choices for body and dental health cures.

  1. Alternate between belief and disbelief enough to research both sides. When dealing with medical cures, keep belief focused on your God and not in the person who might have a doctorate in happy time medicine and a snake oil bottle covered with 21st century marketing.
  2. Complement your belief in complementary medicine with a healthy dose of research reality. Death is inevitable and so is the appearance of charlatans when you are looking for a way out of it.
  3. Just because dentists and doctors don’t have all the answers does not mean they are wrong. When you hear of a cure that is outside of the normal boring scientific, medical realm, take at least one moment to consider it might be pjeudoscience (no empirical evidence to back it up) and that even someone with a doctorate could be seeing UFOs and tracking Bigfoot on his/her time off.

Even very smart people are fooled when their emotions and ignorance (in specific areas) open a door to fantasy and false hope. Science and medicine is not perfect. Sometimes it will fail us. One year a therapy is promoted and the next year it is proven ineffective. But imperfection is no reason to leap off the bridge of reason.

Make sure you avoid using weak claims and personal anecdotes to make your decisions about dental health or medical care. Just because “traditional care” does not have an answer does not mean someone else has it. Make sure their claims are based on more than thin research and the “it has been around a long time” proof. Astrology and psychics have been around a long time too – mostly because we continue to pay for it. Professionals and people using emotional pjeudoscience should be dealt with very cautiously. If you have never heard of this “amazing dental or medical cure” before, it makes sense to find out why.

Plus if anyone were able to cure these terrible diseases and afflictions without a clue about good science, it would be me. After being abducted by a Tri-lateral Commission spacecraft, seeing all their info on JFK’s 2nd and 3rd assassination and how they faked the moon landing, and getting thoroughly educated on quantum Physics by Elvis, I have more on the ball than anyone except maybe George W. and Jenny McCarthy.

Dental Blog Commentary by RAC

BELOW I have noted various sources for dental revision, mercury toxicity, and alternate dentistry and health methods. In no way is this information complete or in any specific hierarchical order, but it is very interesting where it can take you. I developed these website sources by simply searching for various cures related to dentistry. Then each medical or dental health website I visited took me to another site, which took me down another rabbit hole of “how can this be true if the evidence is being reduced to what people need and want to believe?”

The concepts alternative and complementary dental and medical health professionals present can be very convincing at first but the gaps in their evidence and logic are at the very least confusing. Think of medicine as if it was developed from a book over 2,000 years old or from ancient Chinese dude with a needle fetish. As if we want scientists who have not evolved beyond bloodletting and shaman incantations treating us. “Take your stinking laws of science from me, you damn dirty apes of logic and reason! The evolution of science will kill us all!”

Others are traditional establishment, government, and scientific websites, which you might determine are also not reliable because you live in a country where evidence-based reason is unpatriotic and where too many people still believe in the round earth theory. I have also provided some sites where dentists, scientists and skeptics throw in their logic. If you want to refute them, make sure your personal, emotional and/or authority figure anecdotes and non-peer reviewed by a true believer evidentiary studies (which are as thick as a nano-particle– which only science can measure) are also spell checked by the Discovery Institute.

Other websites are very disturbing in how they give people a false hope including personal stories that end in a lot of expense but no cure. They go to these sites that supposedly offer what science-based medicine can’t but only see the positive and do not recognize the confusing meanderings of pjeudoscience logic. There is one way to find out what is NOT going on right on THEIR sites however. You can dig deep enough – in many sites to see how much evidence they have and as well as how much they really believe in it: just look for their disclaimers. They might say the government forces them to display it – but if the government issued license many of them tout had a legitimate, provable value – their disclaimer would NOT totally contradict almost everything they have stated throughout the site!

Here are the body and dental health links...

If you have a different take on reality, let dental blogger know.

  (717 Reads)  Send this story to someone  Printer-friendly page   (0)

Only logged in users are allowed to comment. register/log in
Floss much?
How often do you floss your teeth?
Constantly 15%
Once a day 28%
Once a week 25%
Once a month 1%
Before my visit to the dentist 23%
Never 5%
Current Leader : Once a day
Close Date : Sep 10, 2010 - 03:34 PM
Votes : 59
Detailed Results

Today's Question
Floss much?
How often do you floss your teeth?
Constantly 15%
Once a day 28%
Once a week 25%
Once a month 1%
Before my visit to the dentist 23%
Never 5%
Current Leader : Once a day
Close Date : Sep 10, 2010 - 03:34 PM
Votes : 59
Detailed Results

Online
There are 0 unlogged users and 0 registered users online.

You can log-in or register for a user account here.